1Vote!
West Law Report (Free subscription) | 21/11/2008
From The Times November 19, 2008 State’s positive obligation to prevent inhuman treatment is not absolute House of Lords Published November 19, 2008 E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and Another Before Lord Hoffmann, Lord Scott of Foscote, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Carswell and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Speeches November 12, 2008 The positive obligation imposed on the...
1Vote!
Times Online (Free subscription) | 20/11/2008
There are just eight days left to apply for what must be the hottest jobs in the judiciary — the first specifically appointed posts in the new supreme court. There are three vacancies, as three law lords will retire between now and the start of the court next autumn (Lord Hoffmann, Lord Carswell and Lord Scott of Foscote). For the first time candidates for the highest court in the land must apply....
+Vote!
West Law Report (Free subscription) | 16/11/2008
From The Times November 3, 2008 Retrospective rent rises were not ‘now due’ House of Lords Published November 3, 2008 Scottish and Newcastle plc v Raguz Before Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Speeches October 29, 2008 Rent increases that would become retrospectively payable under uncompleted rent reviews...
- send to a friend
-
Explore : Alcoholic Beverages, Crossbench, Eaton, Industrial Suppliers and Services, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Scottish and Newcastle, The House of Lords, The Parliament, UK Politics
1Vote!
Family Lore (Free subscription) | 03/07/2008
With reference to this post , I have it on very good authority (see the comments to the post) that Mr B has been refused leave to appeal to the House of Lords. Apparently, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Hope of Craighead and Baroness Hale of Richmond denied the appeal because "... the petition does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance ". Accordingly, the ruling of the Court of Appeal...
+Vote!
Times Online (Free subscription) | 31/01/2008
House of Lords Published January 31, 2008 A v Hoare X and Another v Wandsworth London Borough Council C v Middlesborough Council H v Suffolk County Council Young v Catholic Care (Diocese of Leeds) and Another Before Lord Hoffmann, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Carswell and Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood Speeches January 30, 2008
