Click here to create your personal news page. The news that appears on Justice Sullivan will appear there and be constantly updated. You can then modify the page, share it with your friends, or export it and have it appear elsewhere.

You can also create a personal news page and follow the news that interests you by clicking on the tab labelled 'New page'.
 

topics : related - allExplore

Wikio Shopping

  1. 1. Computers
  2. 2. Electronics
  3. 3. Communication
  4. 4. Household Appliances
  5. 5. Car/Motor Bike
  6. 6. Digital Camera
  7. 7. Mobile Phone
  8. 8. Smartphone
  9. 9. PDA
  10. 10. GPS
  11. 11. LCD Monitor
  12. 12. Printer

New products

  1. 1. Casio Exilim EX-Z85
  2. 2. Casio Exilim EX-Z250
  3. 3. Casio Exilim EX-Z300
  4. 4. Razer Megalodon
  5. 5. Asus P6T Deluxe
  6. 6. Onkyo TX-SR806
  7. 7. Microsoft Sidewinder X5
  8. go to Shopping

Participate



Justice Sullivan


Sort by : relevance - date
+Vote!

Law lords: fraud office right to end bribery investigation in BAE case

Led by Lord Bingham, the members of Britain's equivalent of the supreme court overturned what had been an earlier landmark judgment by two of their high court colleagues, Lord Justice Moses and Lord Justice Sullivan.

+Vote!

Lords back SFO over decision to end inquiry into BAE

The case went to the High Court, where, in April, Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan overturned the SFO's decision, saying: "We fear for the reputation of the administration of justice if it can be perverted by a threat." The campaigners were not impressed with yesterday's verdict. Nicholas Hildyard of The Corner House, said: "With the law as it is, a government...

22Vote!

Fraud Office wins BAE appeal

... that the Saudi threat was a "successful attempt by a foreign government to pervert the course of justice in the United Kingdom".Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan said the SFO and the Government made an "abject surrender" to "blatant threats".But Mr Sumption told the Law Lords that the High Court made several incorrect assumptions about the law and the agency's...

1Vote!

SFO was right to call off BAE-Saudi corruption probe, law lords rule

... that the Saudi threat was a "successful attempt by a foreign government to pervert the course of justice in the United Kingdom." Lord Justice Moses and Justice Sullivan said then that the SFO and the Government had made an "abject surrender" to "blatant threats." During hearings in the lords earlier this month Jonathan Sumption QC, for the SFO, told the judges that the...

+Vote!

Lords to rule on Saudi arms inquiry

... that the Saudi threat was a "successful attempt by a foreign government to pervert the course of justice in the United Kingdom."Lord Justice Moses and Justice Sullivan added that the SFO and the Government had made an "abject surrender" to "blatant threats".Mr Sumption told the Law Lords that the High Court had made several incorrect assumptions about the law and the...

+Vote!

Lords to rule on Saudi arms inquiry

... that the Saudi threat was a "successful attempt by a foreign government to pervert the course of justice in the United Kingdom."Lord Justice Moses and Justice Sullivan added that the SFO and the Government had made an "abject surrender" to "blatant threats".Mr Sumption told the Law Lords that the High Court had made several incorrect assumptions about the law and the...

+Vote!

Lords to rule on Saudi arms inquiry

... that the Saudi threat was a "successful attempt by a foreign government to pervert the course of justice in the United Kingdom."Lord Justice Moses and Justice Sullivan added that the SFO and the Government had made an "abject surrender" to "blatant threats".Mr Sumption told the Law Lords that the High Court had made several incorrect assumptions about the law and the...

+Vote!

Fraud office wins Saudi arms appeal

... that the Saudi threat was a "successful attempt by a foreign government to pervert the course of justice in the United Kingdom". Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan said the SFO and the Government made an "abject surrender" to "blatant threats".But Lord Bingham said the director was confronted by "an ugly and obviously unwelcome threat" from the Saudis and had...

+Vote!

Fraud office wins Saudi arms appeal

... that the Saudi threat was a "successful attempt by a foreign government to pervert the course of justice in the United Kingdom". Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan said the SFO and the Government made an "abject surrender" to "blatant threats".But Lord Bingham said the director was confronted by "an ugly and obviously unwelcome threat" from the Saudis and had...

+Vote!

Gurkhas' legal challenge go-ahead

Their case arises out of decisions relating to more than 2,000 retired British Army Gurkhas who have been refused rights to settle as they do not have "strong ties" with the UK.Mr Justice Sullivan, sitting in London, granted a representative group of veterans permission to apply for a judicial review of the lawfulness of a policy they claim is discriminatory.The judge ordered an urgent...

+Vote!

Top barristers battle over BAE Systems arms deal with Saudi Arabia

... involved. In one of the most critical and strongly worded rulings ever made by a judge, Lord Justice Moses, sitting with Mr Justice Sullivan, ruled that a Saudi threat in 2006 to cancel a further arms deal and withdraw diplomatic co-operation was a “successful attempt by a foreign Government to pervert the course of justice in the United Kingdom”. The British Government...

+Vote!

SFO dropped BAE inquiry over 'national security' concerns, law lords told

... Court ruling that the decision was unlawful and made after “blatant threats” from the Saudis. Lord Justice Moses and Mr Justice Sullivan ruled in April that the SFO should have continued its investigation into alleged illegal payments to members of the Saudi Royal Family. The campaigning groups Corner House Research and Campaign Against Arms Trade, which took the case to the...

+Vote!

No government should award itself unreviewable powers

Last week’s report by the House of Commons Justice Committee on the draft Constitutional Renewal Bill draws attention to an issue of fundamental importance: whether judicial review should be excluded if and when the Attorney-General stops a criminal investigation or prosecution on national security grounds. The committee rightly objected to such an unconstitutional immunity.