DavidBroder may be off this week (literally rather than figuratively) but that doesn't mean the Village doesn't have more than enough suitable replacements. I give you former WaPo retread and Politico hack John F. Harris , desperate for some of Chuck Todd's goateed affections. See John F. Harris suck McCain's teat . See John F. Harris laugh about outing a CIA operative. See John F. Harris...
DOWNLOADS: (111) PLAYS: (852) This is an instant classic. Scarborough asks Howard Dean what he thinks of DavidBroder's attack on Harry Reid. See, Broder wrote a column that was, of course, harshly critical of the healthcare bills. (Wars? Go faster! Health care! Wait a minute there, young 'uns!) Harry Reid (D-Nev.) replied that the Senate shouldn't "focus on a man who has...
DOWNLOADS: (14) PLAYS: (217) This is an instant classic. Scarborough asks Howard Dean what he thinks of DavidBroder’s attack on Harry Reid. See, Broder wrote a column that was, of course, harshly critical of a healthcare bills. (Wars? Go faster! Health care! Wait a minute are, young ‘uns!) Harry Reid (D-Nev.) replied that a Senate shouldn’t “focus on a man who has been retired...
DougJ at Balloon Juice: One thing that’s quite striking in the health care debate is the lack of detailed analysis opponents are presenting in their arguments. Compare Ron Brownstein’s positive analysis of the Senate bill for example, with DavidBroder’s meandering, senility ramblings against it. Or this MIT economist’s favorable analysis of its impact on premiums...
... will be circulated to Capitol Hill this week. Read the four-page report here . As Digby says: Now DavidBroder has talked to every "expert" at the Washington Post ( well almost every expert ) and got a different answer, so take all this with a grain of salt. Still, it's important to know what the "scientists" are saying. They often have undue influence on decision...
... wingnuts blogs repeat it , multiple op-eds are issued from folks like Bolton , Peter Roff , and DavidBroder and dozens of others , and then we finally end up with the dithering charge fully mainstreamed, and the Washington Post then feels comfortable to do breezy analyses such as the following: 94 DAYS : Was Obama dithering or decisive? There is no difference between a wingnut blog...
... support the Obama administration, which backs the bill. Veteran Washington Post editorialist DavidBroder called the bill a “budget buster in the making,” saying it will violate President Obama’s “pledge that health insurance reform will not add to our federal budget deficit over the next decade.” He pleaded with the Obama administration and Congress not to “pass along unfunded programs...
One thing that’s quite striking in the health care debate is the lack of detailed analysis opponents are presenting in their arguments. Compare Ron Brownstein’s positive analysis of the Senate bill for example, with DavidBroder’s meandering, senility ramblings against it. Or this MIT economist’s favorable analysis of its impact on [...]
... most states, that prices would not be raised or the policy revoked if they became ill.” Now DavidBroder has talked to every "expert" at the Washington Post ( well almost every expert )and got a different answer, so take all this with a grain of salt. Still, it's important to know what the "scientists" are saying. They often have undue influence on decision...
...he stated naively. Meanwhile, DavidBroder, Chuck Todd, and David Gregory will never emerge to state otherwise : Osama bin Laden was unquestionably within reach of U.S. troops in the mountains of Tora Bora when American military leaders made the crucial and costly decision not to pursue the terrorist leader with massive force, a Senate report says. The report asserts that the...
DC Deaniacs by digby Jamison Foser notes that the Village is rallying around its main man: You've probably noticed that Washington Post columnist DavidBroder and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are having a bit of a spat . Again. What you may have missed was the Beltway media rallying around Broder via a Politico article earlier this week: In an age of ideological divisions,...
You've probably noticed that Washington Post columnist DavidBroder and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are having a bit of a spat . Again. What you may have missed was the Beltway media rallying around Broder via a Politico article earlier this week: In an age of ideological divisions, Broder is widely known as a fair arbiter on Capitol Hill, a journalist who's as interested...
... issues does not automatically equate to having a beneficial position on those issues. WashPost’s DavidBroder and now Newsweek’s Jon Meacham somehow achieved their exalted status without having learned this. Shocker : Lobbyists are lobbying to be able to keep on lobbying . Posted in Aiee! Teh stoopid! It burns!, Hold! Them! Accountable!, I want my money back., Listening to the people...