+Vote!
Travelling Punk (Free subscription) | 08/07/2008
The Guardian reports today on the witness anonymity bill , a bill that if accepted will mean all witness in criminal trials have the right to anonymity, granted by a judge, if they can show a "harm to the public interest" if their names are made public. I can envisage only a small number of criminal trails at which anonymity for witnesses could be a good idea, for example trials for rape. It's well...
+Vote!
janestheone (Free subscription) | 08/07/2008
I am inclined to agree with Geoffrey Robertson writing today on the witness anonymity bill, that it opens the way to cover-ups of dubious practice, or even torture, by police or others, and also to malicious cases being brought and heard. The adversarial principle seems to be important. But I am open to argument. What do readers think?
+Vote!
Indigo Jo Blogs (Free subscription) | 08/07/2008
Geoffrey Robertson: There can be no fair trials with this perjurer's charter (from the Guardian today) Geoffrey Robertson QC (a senior British lawyer, with an interest in human rights and anti-censorship issues) on the bill going through Parliament right now,...